Robert Entwistle

AI as a Productivity Shift

AI speeds up specific tasks. People still own the judgment behind the outcome.

AI StrategyFuture of WorkProductivity

Introduction

AI has become controversial because it changes the value of certain kinds of work. Some people talk about it mainly as a job replacement tool. In my experience, that is too simple.

In most real workflows, AI does not replace an entire role all at once. It usually starts by making specific tasks faster: summarizing information, drafting first versions, classifying content, generating options, or reducing repetitive implementation work. AI often creates the most value when it removes friction from the work around a decision, not when it tries to replace the decision itself.

Examples

  • Law: AI can summarize contracts, review documents, and prepare first drafts. Lawyers still own judgment, risk, client advice, and final accountability.
  • Design: AI can generate variations and mockups quickly. Designers still own taste, direction, brand fit, and the final decision.
  • Software Development: AI can reduce the time spent on boilerplate, tests, documentation, and repetitive implementation. Developers still own architecture, security, maintainability, and quality.
  • Product Management: AI can summarize feedback, classify themes, and compare options. Product managers still own prioritization, tradeoffs, stakeholder alignment, and deciding what should actually be built.
  • Operations and internal workflows: AI can help teams process documents, organize inputs, prepare first drafts, and reduce manual review time. People still own exceptions, edge cases, accountability, and the final call.
  • Media Production: AI can reduce the cost of animation, video, voice, editing, and production work. People still own the story, message, taste, and creative direction.

What Changes in Practice

When AI reduces the time required for a task, teams do not just save time. They often change how they work: reviewing more inputs, comparing more options, handling more volume, or moving work earlier in the process. A team that used to review a small sample of customer feedback can review much more of it. A workflow that used to need manual document sorting can start with structured extraction.

How Productivity Shifts Change Workflow

  • More information can be reviewed before a decision is made.
  • Manual review effort can move toward exceptions instead of routine cases.
  • First drafts become cheaper, which changes where human effort is most valuable.

The point is not that AI makes every workflow better automatically. The point is that once a task becomes cheaper, the process around it should probably change too.

Conclusion

My experience has been that when AI is used properly, the efficiency and productivity gains can be enormous. In some workflows, they are not incremental improvements, they feel like an order-of-magnitude change.

For product, solutions, and technology teams, the useful question is not simply, "Will AI replace this role?" A better question is, "Which parts of this workflow are slow, repetitive, or expensive, and where does human judgment still matter?" That framing helps teams use AI where it removes friction, while keeping people responsible for strategy, quality, risk, customer understanding, and final accountability.

AI will reduce the value of some repetitive tasks, but increase the value of people who can use it well. The advantage goes to people and teams who understand both sides: where AI speeds things up, how that changes the workflow, and where human judgment still matters.